Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42182132›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Immunological imprinting shapes the cross-reactive antibody responses to the KP.2 and LP.8.1 vaccine doses.

Sanjeev Kumar, Lilin Lai, Madison L Ellis, Anamika Patel, Devyani Joshi, Jacob Vander Velden, Jana Ziad Abu Faraj, Sonia T Wimalasena, Ramitha R Pallavi, Jad Iriss and 9 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Sanjeev Kumar
Lilin Lai
Madison L Ellis
Anamika Patel
Jacob Vander Velden
Jana Ziad Abu Faraj
Sonia T Wimalasena
Ramitha R Pallavi
Jad Iriss
Kareem Bechnak
Sri Edupuganti
Vineet D MenacheryORCID 0000-0001-8803-7606
Veronika I Zarnitsyna

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.86 subvariant, a lineage derived from the BA.2 strain, led to the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine update to include KP.2 or related JN.1-lineage spike antigens. We evaluated the magnitude, breadth, and durability of humoral immune responses following a single KP.2 vaccine dose in a longitudinal cohort of 21 individuals up to six months. KP.2 vaccination increased spike-specific binding and neutralizing antibodies against the ancestral WA1 strain, alongside the BA.5, XBB.1.5, and KP.2 variants. Power law modeling estimated half-lives for WA1- and KP.2-specific IgG responses at 770 and 248 days, respectively. Additionally, the KP.2 dose increased IgG1 and IgG4 subclasses more than IgG2 and IgG3 responses to both spike proteins. Serum depletion experiments using WA1 or KP.2 proteins demonstrated most vaccine-elicited antibodies were cross-reactive. Consequently, KP.2 vaccine-induced antibodies retained broad neutralizing activity against recently circulating Omicron subvariants (BA.2.86, KP.3.1.1, XEC, LP.8.1, LF.7, XFG.3.12, PQ.1, BA.3.2.1, and RE.2). Using a live virus neutralization assay, XFG.3.12 showed the greatest reduction in neutralizing titers relative to KP.2 (4.2-fold). In a small subset, an LP.8.1 vaccine dose increased neutralizing activity against the matched variant while maintaining WA1 and KP.2 cross-reactivity, but only modestly increased antibodies to divergent variants BA.3.2.1 and RE.2. Ultimately, these data indicate the KP.2 mRNA vaccine generates durable, cross-reactive responses against current Omicron subvariants. However, ongoing spike evolution impacts neutralization of emerging lineages, highlighting the need for continued viral monitoring and timely vaccine updates. IMPORTANCE: SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, raising ongoing concerns about how well updated vaccines protect against emerging variants. This study evaluates antibody responses after KP.2 spike mRNA vaccine dose and shows that a single dose induces durable and broadly cross-reactive immunity against both earlier strains and recently circulating Omicron subvariants. Despite this breadth, reduced neutralizing activity against certain emerging variants indicates that ongoing antigenic changes can impact vaccine induced antibody effectiveness. These findings provide insight into how current vaccines perform over time and highlight the need to track viral evolution and update vaccine antigens to maintain broad protection against severe disease, hospitalization, and death.

Identifiers

PMID42182132
PMCPMC13192894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.