ArticleFrontiers in neuroergonomics2026
Reframing neuroergonomics in an evolutionary and active inference context.
Article in Frontiers in neuroergonomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Everyday situations, such as feeling nauseous in virtual-reality environments or getting dizzy when reading as a car passenger, reveal how easily our senses can become confused when modern technology disrupts the innate relationship between the physical environment and human sensory systems. Such disruptions expose the vulnerability of the human senses to conflicting input arising in technologically altered environments. Even in the absence of direct sensory conflict, in complex technological settings such as digital factories and modern operating rooms, the convergence of multiple competing stimuli within and across sensory modalities further amplifies sensory load and cognitive strain. The common denominator of all such problems is that our ancient sensory processing and perceptual systems do not fit well with the technological world we have created. This evolutionary mismatch is already significant, but it will become even more critical as mixed reality concepts and advanced digital technologies integrate more deeply into our daily lives. Focusing on sensory mismatch and sensory strain as two significant ramifications of the Anthropocene, we reframe neuroergonomics in an evolutionary and active inference context. Our reframing argues that neuroergonomics must prioritize technology design that respects evolutionarily tuned priors, and should additionally deploy measured epigenetic, gene-culture, and learning-driven interventions as complementary levers to support adaptive change. Thus, we highlight the importance of aligning and grounding neuroergonomic design with the human sensory system according to constraints and affordances defined by human evolutionary history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.