ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
A multichannel MEG time-frequency analysis framework for detecting stage -specific effects of spatial distraction in visual-spatial working memory.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spatial distraction can disrupt visual-spatial working memory (VSWM), but its stage-dependent effects on multichannel neural dynamics remain insufficiently characterized. This study presents a multichannel magnetoencephalography (MEG) time-frequency analysis framework to detect stage-specific oscillatory responses to spatial distraction during a VSWM task. Methods: MEG signals were recorded from healthy participants under Distractor and No-distractor conditions and analyzed across encoding, maintenance, and retrieval/decision epochs. Time-frequency power was estimated in the delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands, and condition differences were evaluated using sensor-level spatiotemporal cluster-based permutation testing and Bonferroni correction within each predefined epoch. Results: The proposed analysis revealed a clear stage-specific pattern, with the most prominent modulation occurring during maintenance. Specifically, distraction induced robust and sustained increases in theta-, alpha-, and beta-band power during the retention interval (all cluster-level Discussion: These findings highlight sustained large-scale oscillatory modulation as a key neural signature of distraction during mnemonic maintenance. The study provides an interpretable multichannel signal-analysis perspective on distraction effects in working memory and offers a practical framework for stage-resolved analysis of brain dynamics in cognitive tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.