Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42182060›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Estimation of head motion in structural MRI and its impact on cortical morphometry.

Charles Bricout, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou, Sylvain Bouix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charles BricoutÉcole de Technologie Supérieure, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Samira Ebrahimi KahouDepartment of Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sylvain BouixÉcole de Technologie Supérieure, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motion-related artifacts are inevitable in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and can bias automated neuroanatomical metrics such as cortical thickness. These biases can interfere with statistical analysis which is a major concern as motion has been shown to be more prominent in certain populations such as children or individuals with ADHD. Manual review cannot objectively quantify motion in anatomical scans, and existing quantitative automated approaches often require specialized hardware or custom acquisition protocols. Here, we train a 3D convolutional neural network to estimate a summary motion metric in retrospective routine research scans by leveraging a large training dataset of synthetically motion-corrupted volumes. We validate our method with one held-out site from our training cohort and with 14 fully independent datasets, including one with manual ratings, achieving a Spearman Rank correlation of 0.71 vs. manual labels. We also tested the correlation of our predicted motion score with morphometric measurements known to be impacted by motion, achieving significant correlation on most datasets. Furthermore, our predicted motion correlates with subject age in line with prior studies. Our approach shows good generalization across scanner brands and protocols, enabling objective, scalable motion assessment in structural MRI studies without prospective motion correction. Finally, we provide empirical evidence that our motion estimator significantly improve model fitness when studying cortical thickness and volume. Our final model is made openly and freely available through "Agitation," a tool usable as a CLI, python package and integrated in Nipoppy and Boutiques. By providing reliable motion estimates, our method offers researchers a tool to assess and account for potential biases in cortical morphometric analyses.

Indexed as

brain MRIcomputer visioncortical morphometrydeep learningmotion artifacts

Identifiers

PMID42182060
PMCPMC13194591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.