ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Developing and validating an artificial intelligence-based electronic triage model for predicting clinical outcomes among cardiac-suspected patients in the emergency department.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Emergency department overcrowding, especially in cardiac units, delays care and raises mortality. Conventional triage is error-prone. We developed an AI-based model integrating routine data and automated ECGs to improve early risk classification. Methods and results: This retrospective cross-sectional study involved 600 medical records of patients presenting with suspected cardiac symptoms. Model development was conducted in three phases: Designing a triage model using routine triage data, designing a triage model based on ECG images, and combining the ECG-based model and triage data. Model performance was evaluated regarding standard clinical outcomes within the first 24 h and compared against the Emergency Severity Index. The best-performing model based on triage data alone (i.e. multilayer perceptron neural network) yielded an accuracy of 89.42%, Conclusion: Given its advantages over models using only routine data, ECG, or conventional triage, the fused AI-based triage model may effectively prioritize and predict cardiac emergency outcomes, providing a foundation for developing reliable, intelligent support systems in acute care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.