Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42182041›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine open2026

Rates of unbalanced chromosome rearrangements associated with pericentric and paracentric inversions: Analysis of molecular chromosome results in embryo samples.

Katrina Merrion, Jessica Adsit, Katherine L Howard, Anjali D Zimmer, Jeffrey T Meltzer, Youbao Sha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katrina MerrionNatera, Inc, Austin, TX.
Jessica AdsitNatera, Inc, Austin, TX.
Katherine L HowardNatera, Inc, Austin, TX.
Anjali D ZimmerNatera, Inc, Austin, TX.
Jeffrey T MeltzerNatera, Inc, Austin, TX.
Youbao ShaNatera, Inc, Austin, TX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements for individuals with pericentric or paracentric inversions undergoing in vitro fertilization. Methods: This retrospective study included trophectoderm (TE) embryo biopsy samples analyzed at a single reference laboratory from 37 reproductive couples who underwent 44 in vitro fertilization cycles. TE biopsies and parental samples were genotyped using Illumina CytoSNP-12b microarrays with bioinformatic analysis to determine the parental origin of each chromosome. Results: For 137 TE biopsy samples with results from 24 individuals with pericentric inversions, the frequency of deletions and duplications related to the inversion was analyzed based on the relative size of the inverted segment. We observed a rate of 5% inversion-associated deletions and duplications for samples from individuals with inversions <30% of the chromosome, 3% from inversions 30% to 50% of the chromosome, and 21% from inversions >50% of the chromosome. Of 43 TE biopsy samples from 7 individuals with paracentric inversions, 2% had inversion-associated deletions and duplications, and 7% had monosomy related to the parental inversion, all of which were from 1 individual. Conclusion: Although previously considered to have minimal reproductive impact, we identified inversion-associated abnormalities in TE biopsy samples from individuals with paracentric and small pericentric inversions, underscoring a small but meaningful reproductive risk associated with these rearrangements.

Indexed as

Chromosome inversionsParacentric inversionPericentric inversionPreimplantation genetic testingUnbalanced chromosome rearrangements

Identifiers

PMID42182041
PMCPMC13196298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.