ArticleGenetics in medicine open2026
Evaluating and monitoring liver disease severity in glycogen storage disease type IX: Performance of novel and established clinical scores.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Hepatic glycogen storage disease type IX (GSD IX) results from a deficiency of phosphorylase kinase. A noninvasive method of monitoring liver disease severity in this population is unavailable and liver biopsy remains the gold standard for classifying disease severity, particularly for liver fibrosis. Methods: We proposed 2 novel hepatic GSD IX-specific liver disease severity scoring systems: one that incorporated laboratory parameters ("novel lab-only score") and one that incorporated laboratory, abdominal imaging, and growth parameters ("novel comprehensive score"). We compared their performance with established scoring systems used for other liver diseases and liver biopsy to determine concordance. Results: Liver disease severity was assessed in 56 pediatric participants with hepatic GSD IX. The novel lab-only and comprehensive scores correctly differentiated between mild and severe liver disease in 72.4% and 66.7% of participants, respectively. The Pediatric Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Fibrosis Score demonstrated the highest accuracy in liver disease severity classification, correctly differentiating between mild and severe liver disease in 82.4% of participants. Conclusion: Hepatic GSD IX requires longitudinal monitoring and liver disease severity prediction scores may be useful clinical tools to noninvasively grade the severity of liver disease. Liver biopsy remains an important part of clinical management to understand the extent of liver disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.