Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181993›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience applied2026

Examining varying number of intervention-modules and change in individual networks in young people remitted from depression or anxiety: Exploratory outcomes of the StayFine randomized clinical trial.

S J Robberegt, C J Albers, B E A M Kooiman, A H Vuuregge, J D Mul, N Wilts, M H Nauta, Y A J Stikkelbroek, C L H Bockting

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience applied, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S J RobberegtAmsterdam UMC, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C J AlbersDepartment of Psychometrics & Statistics, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
B E A M KooimanDepression Expertise Centre-Youth, GGZ Oost Brabant, Boekel, the Netherlands.
A H VuureggeCentre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J D MulCentre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
N WiltsAmsterdam UMC, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M H NautaDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Y A J StikkelbroekDepression Expertise Centre-Youth, GGZ Oost Brabant, Boekel, the Netherlands.
C L H BocktingAmsterdam UMC, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In network theory, symptoms of mental disorders constitute networks of interconnected nodes. Interventions can target (aspects of) networks. Assuming that combined intervention-modules target multiple aspects of networks simultaneously, we examined on average whether receiving more intervention-modules was associated with more baseline to post-intervention change in network characteristics. Between Dec-2019 and May-2024, 14-to-22-year-old individuals (89.8% female) remitted from depressive or anxiety disorders were randomized (1:1) to relapse prevention intervention-modules plus care as usual (M + CAU;

Indexed as

Anxiety disordersDepressive disordersDigital interventionsEcological momentary assessmentNetwork approachRelapse prevention

Identifiers

PMID42181993
PMCPMC13195766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.