ReviewBiomaterial investigations in dentistry2026
Eggshell sourced hydroxyapatite as a bone regenerative material in dentistry - a narrative review.
Review in Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although bone is a dynamic connective tissue with inherent regenerating potential, grafting materials are frequently needed to recuperate shape and function in cases of bone defects. Eggshell-derived hydroxyapatite (EHA) and its nano-form (EnHA) have become viable alternatives because of their availability, affordability, osteoconductivity, biocompatibility, and environmental friendliness. Human studies evaluating the clinical potential of EHA/EnHA in bone regeneration that were published between 2014 and 2024 were reviewed. A total of seven trials with 112 patients and 88 intervention locations were included in this narrative review. EHA showed promising results in improving bone density, volume, and healing time across a variety of motives including socket preservation, intrabony defects, apicoectomy, and cystic lesions. When paired with platelet-rich fibrin, EnHA consistently demonstrated better healing than ungrafted areas and equivalent outcomes to conventional grafts, such as demineralised freeze-dried bone allograft and synthetic hydroxyapatite. Significant improvements in bone density and the production of new trabecular bone were confirmed by radiographic and histomorphometric investigations. The therapeutic viability of materials generated from eggshells is further supported by their high calcium content, non-cytotoxic profile, and efficient high-temperature sterilising. However, there are drawbacks, such as inconsistent resorption rates, a dearth of long-term randomised controlled studies, and a lack of established preparation procedures. Large multi-centre studies, long-term result validation, and manufacturing process optimisation should be the main areas of future study. However, with the existing literature, EHA and EnHA are found to be affordable, biocompatible, and sustainable substitutes for conventional graft materials in bone repair and regeneration in dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.