ReviewParasite epidemiology and control2026
Applying Machine learning to analyze the utilization of insecticide-treated nets among rural under-five children in East Africa.
Review in Parasite epidemiology and control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Malaria continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children under the age of five in the sub-Saharan region of Africa. Despite being one of the pillars of prevention, the use of Insecticide-Treated Nets (ITNs) is still low in rural East Africa. This research aimed to forecast the use of ITNs by rural communities with children in this region using machine learning (ML) and identify the most predictive factors. Methods: We analyzed pooled data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) in 11 East African nations between 2011 and 2022. Six ML classification models, K-Nearest Neighbours, Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Random Forest, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Naïve Bayes, and Logistic Regression, were developed to predict ITN adoption. Model performance was evaluated using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-Score, and ROC-AUC. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to improve model interpretability and to rank feature importance. Result: In 98,684 weighted household samples, the prevalence of general ITN use was 47.12%. The MLP model generalized best overall, achieving the highest accuracy (91.56%) and ROC-AUC (97.15%), with very high precision (87.95%) and recall (95.24%). While the SVC model had better recall (99.92%), its precision (84.19%) was significantly lower, indicating a higher proportion of false positives. MLP's F1-score of 91.39% restored it as the most balanced classifier in this scenario. SHAP analysis identified the number of children who slept under ITNs and the number of ITNs in the home as the strongest predictors. More community-level wealth, household wealth, and media exposure were also positively associated with ITN use. Conclusion: Machine learning made accurate predictions of ITN use, with the MLP model having the best and most balanced performance. SHAP allowed us to uncover actionable reasons for the most influential drivers of ITN use. These evidence-based outcomes can inform targeted public health interventions to improve ITN coverage and utilization in high-risk rural settings, ultimately reducing malaria cases and deaths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.