Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181935›Full record

ReviewParasite epidemiology and control2026

Applying Machine learning to analyze the utilization of insecticide-treated nets among rural under-five children in East Africa.

Fentahun Bikale Kebede, Amanuel Worku, Angwach Abrham Asnake, Eliyas Addisu Taye, Kussie Urmale Mare, Abiy Mergia Bulto, Abraham Keffale Mengistu, Tsegereda Abebe Andargie, Bewuketu Terefe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasite epidemiology and control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fentahun Bikale KebedeStrategic Affairs Executive Office, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Amanuel WorkuAddis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Angwach Abrham AsnakeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Eliyas Addisu TayeDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Kussie Urmale MareDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Semera University, Semera, Ethiopia.
Abiy Mergia BultoPlanning, reporting, and Accountability Division, Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abraham Keffale MengistuDepartment of Health Informatics, College of Medicine Health Science, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Tsegereda Abebe AndargieInternational Institute for Primary Health-Care, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Bewuketu TerefeSchool of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Malaria continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children under the age of five in the sub-Saharan region of Africa. Despite being one of the pillars of prevention, the use of Insecticide-Treated Nets (ITNs) is still low in rural East Africa. This research aimed to forecast the use of ITNs by rural communities with children in this region using machine learning (ML) and identify the most predictive factors. Methods: We analyzed pooled data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) in 11 East African nations between 2011 and 2022. Six ML classification models, K-Nearest Neighbours, Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Random Forest, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Naïve Bayes, and Logistic Regression, were developed to predict ITN adoption. Model performance was evaluated using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-Score, and ROC-AUC. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to improve model interpretability and to rank feature importance. Result: In 98,684 weighted household samples, the prevalence of general ITN use was 47.12%. The MLP model generalized best overall, achieving the highest accuracy (91.56%) and ROC-AUC (97.15%), with very high precision (87.95%) and recall (95.24%). While the SVC model had better recall (99.92%), its precision (84.19%) was significantly lower, indicating a higher proportion of false positives. MLP's F1-score of 91.39% restored it as the most balanced classifier in this scenario. SHAP analysis identified the number of children who slept under ITNs and the number of ITNs in the home as the strongest predictors. More community-level wealth, household wealth, and media exposure were also positively associated with ITN use. Conclusion: Machine learning made accurate predictions of ITN use, with the MLP model having the best and most balanced performance. SHAP allowed us to uncover actionable reasons for the most influential drivers of ITN use. These evidence-based outcomes can inform targeted public health interventions to improve ITN coverage and utilization in high-risk rural settings, ultimately reducing malaria cases and deaths.

Indexed as

Insecticide-treated netsMachine learningRural East AfricaUnder-five children

Identifiers

PMID42181935
PMCPMC13196376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.