Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181885›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Artificial intelligence for coordinating vaccine design, antiviral discovery, and real-world monitoring in the era of emerging and endemic viral threats.

Adewunmi Akingbola, Abiodun Adegbesan, Olajumoke Adewole, Kehinde O Adebiyi, Akpevwe Emmanuel Benson, Olajide Ojo, Jessica Otumara Urowoli, Opeyemi Joshua Alabi, Oluwaremilekun Juliet Ojeriakhi, Mayowa Shekoni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adewunmi AkingbolaDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Abiodun AdegbesanDepartment of Global Health, African Cancer Institute, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Olajumoke AdewoleDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Kehinde O AdebiyiDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Akpevwe Emmanuel BensonFaculty of pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.
Olajide OjoSchool of Applied Sciences, University of West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jessica Otumara UrowoliSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Opeyemi Joshua AlabiDepartment of Community Health and Primary Care, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Ojo, Nigeria.
Oluwaremilekun Juliet OjeriakhiDepartment of Public Health, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MA, United States.
Mayowa ShekoniDepartment of Community Health, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Ojo, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine development has traditionally been a lengthy and resource-intensive process, often struggling to keep pace with rapidly emerging infectious threats. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer new opportunities to transform this landscape by enabling faster, more precise, and data-driven approaches to vaccine design. This review examines how AI is being applied across key stages of vaccine development, including antigen discovery, epitope prediction, structural optimisation, immunogenicity assessment, and safety evaluation. We highlight the use of machine learning and deep learning models to analyse large-scale genomic, proteomic, and immunological datasets, allowing for more targeted identification of promising vaccine candidates. While AI-driven approaches show considerable promise, their successful translation into effective vaccines depends on the quality and representativeness of the data used, as well as close integration with experimental and clinical validation. Current challenges include data bias, limited representation of populations from low- and middle-income countries, and the need for transparent and interpretable models that can support regulatory decision-making. By synthesising recent developments and ongoing challenges, this review underscores the potential of AI to complement traditional vaccine development pipelines. When responsibly implemented, AI-based methods may accelerate vaccine innovation, improve global preparedness, and support more equitable responses to future infectious disease outbreaks.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceglobal health preparednessinfectious diseasesmachine learningpandemicsvaccine design

Identifiers

PMID42181885
PMCPMC13194142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.