ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Artificial intelligence for coordinating vaccine design, antiviral discovery, and real-world monitoring in the era of emerging and endemic viral threats.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaccine development has traditionally been a lengthy and resource-intensive process, often struggling to keep pace with rapidly emerging infectious threats. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer new opportunities to transform this landscape by enabling faster, more precise, and data-driven approaches to vaccine design. This review examines how AI is being applied across key stages of vaccine development, including antigen discovery, epitope prediction, structural optimisation, immunogenicity assessment, and safety evaluation. We highlight the use of machine learning and deep learning models to analyse large-scale genomic, proteomic, and immunological datasets, allowing for more targeted identification of promising vaccine candidates. While AI-driven approaches show considerable promise, their successful translation into effective vaccines depends on the quality and representativeness of the data used, as well as close integration with experimental and clinical validation. Current challenges include data bias, limited representation of populations from low- and middle-income countries, and the need for transparent and interpretable models that can support regulatory decision-making. By synthesising recent developments and ongoing challenges, this review underscores the potential of AI to complement traditional vaccine development pipelines. When responsibly implemented, AI-based methods may accelerate vaccine innovation, improve global preparedness, and support more equitable responses to future infectious disease outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.