ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Administrative interventions in antimicrobial stewardship: a global scoping review of all WHO regions.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interventions to Reduce Antibiotic Prescribing in Small Animal Veterinary Practice: Evidence and Clinical Impact.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although global antimicrobial resistance strategies increasingly emphasize multisectoral and systems-level responses, the role of administrative and governance-driven interventions within antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) remains relatively underexplored in the literature. Successful antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) can only be achieved through multi-stakeholders' efforts, administration, and leadership at a multifaceted health system level, involving interventions that engage healthcare providers and patients and are supported by governance commitment and backed by financial support. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and map global evidence on administrative AMS interventions that shape ASPs. A systematic search of major databases (Google Scholar and PubMed) was conducted for studies published between January 2005 and June 2025. A total of 76 studies across all the World Health Organization (WHO) regions met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The included studies comprised observational studies, quasi-experimental studies, randomized control trials, and mixed-method studies. Data were extracted, mapped, and structured into six thematic categories pertaining to administrative AMS interventions: 1. health-system administrative governance, 2. community-centered administrative strategies, 3. prescription rationalization and dispensing regulation, 4. institutional accountability and premiums, 5. technology-driven education and capacity building, and 6. infection prevention measures. The findings of this study highlight the crucial role of governance-driven administrative interventions in strengthening antimicrobial stewardship and provide policy-relevant insights for augmenting administrative stewardship strategies globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.