Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181835›Full record

ArticleSleep medicine: X2026

Differences in insomnia-related factors between working-age and older adults: A comparison of nocturnal and daytime symptoms.

Koyo Higami, Masumi Osao, Isa Okajima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep medicine: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Koyo HigamiBehavioral Sleep Medicine and Sciences Laboratory, Department of Psychological Counseling, Faculty of Humanities, Tokyo Kasei University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masumi OsaoYoyogi Sleep Disorder Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Isa OkajimaBehavioral Sleep Medicine and Sciences Laboratory, Department of Psychological Counseling, Faculty of Humanities, Tokyo Kasei University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to (1) clarify the characteristics of nocturnal and daytime symptoms among working-age and older adults and (2) classify insomnia types within each age group and examine the characteristics associated with each type. Methods: An online survey was conducted, and data from 1655 participants were analyzed. Participants were categorized into working-age adults (30-64 years) and older adults (≥65 years). Based on the presence or absence of nocturnal symptoms and daytime dysfunction according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Third Edition criteria, participants were classified as normal sleepers, having subsyndromal insomnia, or having insomnia syndrome. Nocturnal and daytime symptoms were assessed using validated self-reported measures. Results: Compared with older adults, working-age adults showed significantly worse scores for all nocturnal and daytime symptoms. In working-age adults, subsyndromal insomnia was associated with sleep-wake characteristics, whereas insomnia syndrome was strongly associated with sleep debt, fatigue, and anxiety. Conversely, insomnia syndrome was primarily associated with sleep debt and fatigue among older adults. Notably, fatigue showed a greater discriminative ability than daytime sleepiness in distinguishing insomnia types across age groups. Conclusion: The nocturnal and daytime profiles associated with sleep problems differed between working-age and older adults. These findings suggest that age-specific assessment and treatment strategies are warranted and that fatigue may be a particularly important indicator when evaluating daytime dysfunction related to insomnia.

Indexed as

Daytime symptomsFatigueInsomniaOlder adultsWorking-age adults

Identifiers

PMID42181835
PMCPMC13196576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.