ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Case report: persistent fifth aortic arch presenting as a giant ascending aortic aneurysm: diagnostic challenge and surgical resolution with Bentall procedure.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An ascending aortic aneurysm is defined as dilatation of the ascending aorta to ≥1.5 times its normal diameter. Surgical intervention is recommended when the diameter exceeds 55 mm to prevent life-threatening complications such as rupture or dissection. Persistent fifth aortic arch is a rare congenital vascular anomaly, which may present as a dual-lumen aortic configuration and can mimic acquired pathological conditions such as aortic dissection or aneurysm, posing a diagnostic challenge. Case summary: A 39-year-old male with long-standing hypertension presented with cough and shortness of breath. Initial computed tomography (CT) performed to exclude pulmonary embolism incidentally revealed a markedly dilated ascending aorta. Following intensive care unit admission and stabilization, echocardiography and CT aortography demonstrated severe aortic regurgitation and a giant ascending aortic aneurysm measuring 10.5 cm with dual-lumen morphology interpreted radiologically as Stanford type A aortic dissection. The patient underwent urgent Bentall procedure. Histopathological examination confirmed a dual-lumen vascular structure consistent with persistent fifth aortic arch, establishing the congenital aetiology. The patient recovered uneventfully and remained asymptomatic during cardiothoracic follow-up. Conclusion: This case highlights the diagnostic challenge of distinguishing congenital persistent fifth aortic arch from acquired aortic dissection in the setting of a giant ascending aneurysm. Despite radiologic ambiguity, prompt surgical repair was definitive. Histopathological confirmation provided etiologic clarity and contributes to understanding the natural history of this rare anomaly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.