Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181801›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia and translational medicine2026

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in neurosurgery: A critical appraisal of established practices, ongoing controversies, and future trajectories.

Yu'e Sun, Fei Xu, Nazneen Sudhan, Fuhai Ji, Ke Peng, Xiaqing Ma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yu'e SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China.
Fei XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China.
Nazneen SudhanDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford RM1 2BA, UK.
Fuhai JiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Ke PengDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford RM1 2BA, UK.
Xiaqing MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has evolved from a novel technique into an evidence-based standard treatment method for high-risk neurosurgical and spinal surgeries. Its effectiveness is based on two interrelated pillars: optimized multimodal monitoring, mainly including motor and somatosensory evoked potentials (MEPs/SSEPs) as well as electromyography (EMG), and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) combined with a precise neuromuscular blockade-based anesthesia protocol. IONM significantly reduces neurological function damage during surgeries for spinal deformities, intramedullary tumors, acoustic neuromas, and gliomas in the brain functional area, redefining the standards of safe surgical practice. However, there are still certain challenges, including the difficulty in converting signal changes into clinical actions, controlling high false alarm rates, and overcoming technical/logistical obstacles in complex and lengthy surgeries. These objectively existing problems further highlight the importance of clinical judgment. Looking to the future, a key developmental direction involves transforming intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) from a passive monitoring tool into a system capable of predictive guidance and comprehensive neuroprotection. Emerging models include artificial intelligence (AI) technologies for real-time analysis and technologies for fusing multimodal data into surgical "dashboards", but they still face significant obstacles in data quality, clinical validation, and human-centered design. Closed-loop systems and the application of neurobiomarker recognition to achieve neuroprotection remain enduring research topics. In summary, the development of IONM technology towards a more mature direction requires a coordinated planning scheme: establishing evidence-based standards, promoting data-driven discoveries through large-scale collaborative research, and achieving deep multidisciplinary integration within the surgical team. The ultimate goal is to make IONM an intelligent guiding tool that not only monitors but also actively optimizes surgical strategies to ensure the preservation of neural function.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceEvoked potentialsIntraoperative neurophysiological monitoringModern neurosurgerySurgical guidance

Identifiers

PMID42181801
PMCPMC13197767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.