ArticleHardwareX2026
An open-source spectral measurement platform for plant reflectance and material identification.
Article in HardwareX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spectral sensing plays a crucial role in agriculture, environmental monitoring, and material characterization, providing non-destructive insights into chemical composition and physiological status of plants. Commercial spectrometers, however, are often expensive and lack modularity, which limits their adoption in educational, research and field applications. The developed open-source spectral measurement platform addresses this gap by offering a low-cost, customizable solution for reflectance analysis in plant leaves and diverse materials. The system integrates a Hamamatsu C12880MA miniature spectrometer with dual illumination: a white LED and a 3 mm incandescent bulb, covering 340-850 nm. Control and acquisition are managed by a Teensy 3.2 microcontroller through a Python interface that enables calibration and data storage. The modular enclosure, fabricated via RepRap-class fused filament-based 3D printing and PVC components, ensures flexibility and reproducibility. Validation tests demonstrated accurate wavelength alignment when exposed to laser sources, with peaks detected at 407 nm and 663 nm, and mean squared errors of 0.0131 and 0.0208, respectively. Ambient light comparisons with a commercial OSHP spectrometer yielded an MSE of 0.0105 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.