ArticleInnovation in aging2026
Does leisure activity matter for epigenetic aging? Analyses of arts engagement and physical activity in the UK Household Longitudinal Study.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Over the past decade, aging clocks have become widely adopted as important tools for understanding biological aging and have been redefining notions of "pro-longevity" lifestyles. However, this work is still at an early stage. Some leisure activities, such as arts and cultural engagement (ACEng), have never been studied at all, while others, such as physical activity (PA), have only received scant attention. Research Design and Methods: This study used data from 3,556 adults (2010-2012) in the UK Household Longitudinal Study, a large, nationally-representative cohort study, which includes 7 derived epigenetic clocks. We used a doubly robust estimation using the inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment estimator adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, data collection gaps, and technical covariates of epigenetic clocks. Results: ACEng and PA were related to slower epigenetic aging in the PhenoAge, DunedinPoAm and DunedinPACE clocks, although not to the other measured clocks (Lin, Horvath 2018, Horvath 2013, and Hannum), with comparable effect sizes between ACEng and PA. Evidence was consistently found across different measures of engagement, including diversity and frequency for ACEng, as well as frequency, diversity, and activeness for PA. These results were generally stronger amongst middle-aged and older adults aged 40 or above. Discussion and Implications: Our study provides the first evidence that ACEng, a much more recently recognized health behavior, is related to epigenetic aging, with magnitudes comparable to PA. These findings position ACEng as a potential contributor to healthy aging at the biological level, supporting its inclusion in public health strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.