ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Long-term cardiovascular impact of COVID-19 among hospitalised and non-hospitalised populations: a narrative synthesis review.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: COVID-19, initially recognised as a respiratory illness, affects multiple organ systems, including the cardiovascular system. Both hospitalised and non-hospitalised patients may experience persistent cardiac complications; however, the long-term impact across different levels of disease severity remains unclear. This review aims to summarise the existing evidence on the long-term cardiovascular impact of COVID-19, with a particular focus on differences between hospitalised and non-hospitalised patients. Method: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase databases were searched for studies published between December 2019 and January 2024 that investigated cardiovascular outcomes in long COVID. Studies were screened for eligibility, and data were extracted using a standardised form. Due to heterogeneity across the included studies, a narrative synthesis was performed. Results: Seventy-one studies were included, most of which were observational and conducted in Europe and Asia, with follow-up periods ranging from <1 to >24 months. Hospitalised patients reported more frequent cardiovascular symptoms; however, echocardiographic abnormalities were observed across all groups. Reporting of symptom severity was inconsistent. Common cardiovascular manifestations included palpitations, chest pain, fatigue, and arrhythmias. Persistent cardiac dysfunction and dysautonomia were observed regardless of hospitalisation status. Conclusion: Hospitalised patients are at higher risk of long-term cardiovascular complications, including myocardial injury, arrhythmias, and heart failure, while non-hospitalised individuals may experience subclinical cardiac changes. Vaccination appears to have a protective effect. Standardised, prospective studies are needed to clarify long-term cardiovascular risks and to guide follow-up care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.