Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181614›Full record

ArticlePhysica scripta2025

Interior soft x-ray tomography with sparse global sampling.

Axel Ekman, Jian-Hua Chen, Carolyn A Larabell, Mark A Le Gros, Venera Weinhardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physica scripta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Axel EkmanNational Center for X-ray Tomography, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4210-2617
Jian-Hua ChenNational Center for X-ray Tomography, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7998-0878
Carolyn A LarabellNational Center for X-ray Tomography, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6262-4789
Mark A Le GrosNational Center for X-ray Tomography, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.
Venera WeinhardtCentre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg University, 69221 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9774-3833

Funding

User Training and OutreachP30GM138441 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LARABELL, CAROLYN A · 2020 to 2023
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM138441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the feasibility of interior imaging reconstruction in soft X-ray tomography for higher-resolution cellular imaging, including whole-cell imaging, we develop an alignment and reconstruction algorithm that combines a small number of sparse whole-cell images with a high-resolution local interior scan. Based on numerical simulations, we demonstrate that combined reconstructions mitigate the depth-of-field limitation in high-resolution scans, enable radiation dose optimization, and yield quantitative X-ray absorption values with sparse sampling. We further validate our numerical approach using experimental data from two different cell types and show that the combined reconstruction reliably provides high spatial resolution within an interior region of interest of a whole cell. The resulting sparse reconstruction framework offers robust, faithful visualization of cellular organelles in soft X-ray tomography. This mesoscale imaging strategy allows one to 'scout' and zoom into selected subcellular volumes of interest, enabling increased spatial resolution without sacrificing larger-volume imaging and providing information on the relative positions of all organelles within a cell.

Indexed as

3D imagingimage processingtomography

Identifiers

PMID42181614
PMCPMC13192992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.