ReviewAnnals of joint2026
A clinical practice review: augmentation of meniscoligamentous structures for primary prevention of knee joint deterioration.
Review in Annals of joint, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meniscus and ligament injuries of the knee can have significant implications on both short-term activity level as well as long-term knee health. While great advancements in technique and treatment strategy for these injuries have been made in recent years, clinical failure and progressive joint deterioration remain significant concerns. At the same time, technical advancements are being made throughout orthopedics, especially in the field of sports medicine. Many of these developing technologies focus on augmenting stability in the early postoperative period while optimizing biology, with the end goal of a well-integrated repair or reconstruction of the injured structure. Although these technologies are rapidly expanding, with many similar ideas developing in parallel, a basic understanding of the current landscape will be necessary to incorporate them into practice moving forward. Four main augmentation strategies pertaining to meniscoligamentous injuries involve suture, scaffolds, allograft, and biologics. Although the literature is in its infancy for some of these techniques, short- and mid-term outcomes have been promising for many of them. Direct comparison between techniques is often limited by heterogeneity in their application and study design. Ultimately, further study and appropriate incorporation of these augmentation strategies will help to improve current surgical technique with the goal of improving short-term recovery and long-term joint health for patients with meniscoligamentous injuries. This article provides an overview of the current landscape of strategies and technologies in augmentation of meniscus and ligament surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.