Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181594›Full record

ReviewAnnals of joint2026

Psychological factors influencing return to sport after shoulder stabilization: assessment tools and intervention strategies-a narrative review.

Adam J Popchak, W Alex Fails, Johan Högberg, Kirsten Hogg, Eric Hamrin Senorski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of joint, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam J PopchakDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-6541
W Alex FailsDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Johan HögbergDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kirsten HoggDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Eric Hamrin SenorskiDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Glenohumeral instability is common in young, competitive athletes and is frequently treated with surgical stabilization. This population presents a unique challenge for the sports medicine provider, with the common goal of returning to prior levels of sport (RTSP) potentially conflicting with the stabilizing operation. In addition to traditionally assessed physical factors, psychological and psychosocial factors have emerged as potentially affecting athletes' RTSP outcomes after shoulder stabilization and warrant consideration throughout the rehabilitation process and in clearance decision-making. However, these factors may frequently go unassessed and unaddressed in current practice. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to describe psychological factors that may influence athletes' RTSP outcomes after shoulder stabilization, discuss currently available tools for assessment of and potential interventions to address these factors and support improved outcomes. Methods: A review of the current literature on the psychological aspects associated with shoulder stabilization and RTSP was conducted to identify specific psychological barriers, aspects of recovery, assessment tools, and intervention methods. Key Content and Findings: Athletes who desire to RTSP after shoulder stabilization face many challenges and barriers during the recovery process. In addition to physical challenges throughout rehabilitation, the athlete experiences psychological challenges and states that, while common, they may hinder RTSP if left unaddressed. Recognition of an athlete's unique psychological characteristics and challenges and subsequently addressing them with appropriate interventions may support successful RTSP after shoulder stabilization. Conclusions: The prevalence of psychological factors that affect athletes' ability to RTSP after shoulder stabilization has become well known. General and disease-specific assessment tools are available to identify those who may benefit from psychological interventions alongside physical rehabilitation to support RTSP. Combining these interventions is often reported to have positive effects on known emotional and behavioral impairments displayed by athletes after shoulder stabilization and other injuries/surgeries, though more research is needed to describe specific interventions and their effects directly on RTSP outcomes in appropriately matched athletes. It is important for the clinician to recognize these psychological barriers and work with their patients to address them to maximize outcomes.

Indexed as

fear of reinjurypsychological assessmentreturn to sportShoulder instability

Identifiers

PMID42181594
PMCPMC13190638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.