ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Ophthalmologic assessment and intracranial pressure in children: diagnostic methods, clinical correlations, and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in the pediatric population represents a critical and potentially life-threatening condition that may lead to severe neurological sequelae, including brain herniation, cerebral ischemia, and irreversible neurological impairment, such as visual loss. The diagnosis of elevated ICP in children is particularly complex, as clinical manifestations are frequently subtle and non-specific, especially in infants and young children. Symptoms such as irritability, poor feeding, lethargy, and failure to thrive often overlap with a wide range of common pediatric disorders, thereby contributing to delayed diagnosis and an increased risk of adverse neurological outcomes. Within this context, ophthalmologic evaluation constitutes a key non-invasive tool in the early detection of increased ICP. Fundoscopic examination provides critical diagnostic information, with optic disc abnormalities among the most sensitive markers of elevated ICP. However, these findings may be less pronounced or exhibit distinct characteristics in children compared to adults, and their interpretation is further complicated by age-related variability in ocular anatomy and intracranial pressure norms. This review provides an integrated synthesis of current diagnostic strategies for assessing elevated ICP in children, with a particular focus on ophthalmologic assessment. It examines the association between specific ocular findings and ICP, with the aim of improving early recognition, guiding clinical management, and enhancing patient outcomes. Furthermore, it addresses the inherent challenges of pediatric ICP diagnosis and highlights key gaps in the literature that warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.