ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Clinical spectrum of pediatric-onset Erdheim-Chester disease: insights from a single-center case series.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Literature review of pediatric Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) and mixed histiocytosis (Langerhans cell histiocytosis/ECD).Annals of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Pediatric-onset Erdheim-Chester disease (PECD) is considerably rarer than the adult-onset Erdheim-Chester disease (AECD). This study aimed to characterize the clinical, laboratory, imaging, and outcome features of PECD and to compare similarities and differences with adult-onset cases treated at the same center. Methods: We performed a comparative analysis of PECD and AECD patients treated at the same center over the same period, examining differences in clinical presentation, laboratory and imaging findings, treatment responses, and outcomes. Results: Five pediatric and sixty-seven adult patients were included. Central nervous system and hypothalamic or pituitary involvement were observed in over 50% of children. PECD patients demonstrated distinct organ involvement patterns, including lower rates of bone involvement (60.0% vs. 97.0%; Conclusions: PECD and AECD differ in clinical manifestations and the intensity of systemic inflammation. Pediatric patients appear to have more favorable survival outcomes. These findings suggest potential age-related differences in disease presentation and inflammatory burden. Nevertheless, validation in larger multicenter cohorts is required, underscoring the necessity for large-scale, multicenter collaborative investigations to inform the development of pediatric-specific management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.