Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181537›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Demonstration of anatomical and technical details of robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy as described in the current literature.

J Rassweiler, Sara Sander, Marie-Claire Rassweiler-Seyfried

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J RassweilerDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria.
Sara SanderDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria.
Marie-Claire Rassweiler-SeyfriedDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Mannheim, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Since robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has nowadays become widely accepted world-wide, there needs to be an agreement on the most efficient surgical techniques. This should be based on the video-anatomy of the prostate and a summary of the actual literature. Material and methods: Using video material taken during RALP-procedures performed by the same surgeon (J.R.), the anatomical details of different surgical techniques and operative steps are shown based on the anatomy of the male pelvis applying the standard nomenclature. This was supplemented by a systematic literature search in PubMed focusing on preservation of continence and minimal rates of positive margins. 3,825 publications could be reduced to 604 articles according to the inclusion criteria (randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews and clinical studies), When expanding the search to encompass individual operation techniques, we identified 27 relevant articles. Results: Crucial surgical details include preserving the levator fascia, the puboprostatic collar, a long urethral stump with protection of the urethral lissosphincter and posteriorly reconstruction of the rectourethralis with the prostatovesical muscle. Fascial preservation for the M. Levator ani results to one year-continence between 78,0 and 98,3%, preservation of the puboprostatic collar and detrusor apron between 95,6 and 100%, maximal functional urethral length between 90,5 and 97,5%. Posterior reconstruction leads to a 3-months continence between 92,3 and 96,9%. Preserving the Retzius` space and thus the total anterior sphincter apparatus results to a one-year continence of 95,8%, however associated with a higher rate of positive surgical margins (14-42 vs. 10-29%). Conclusions: The increase of knowledge of the video-anatomy of the prostate and surrounding structures allows translation into novel surgical techniques of RALP. Thereby continence rates could be significantly improved including approaches to spare anatomical structures of the sphincter apparatus, such as preservation of the levator fascia, the puboprostatic collar, the urethral lissosphincter, but also reconstructive techniques, such as posterior reconstruction of the vesico-prostatic and recto-urethralis muscle. Demanding techniques, such as the Retzius-sparing approach result to higher continence rates, but are also associated with a higher rate of surgical margins.

Indexed as

continencepositive marginsrobot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomysurgical techniquevideo-anatomy

Identifiers

PMID42181537
PMCPMC13189793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.