ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Minimal Invasive Navigation-Assisted Removal of Penetrating Metallic Foreign Bodies in the Craniomaxillofacial Region: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Minimal Invasive Navigation-Assisted Removal of Penetrating Metallic Foreign Bodies in the Craniomaxillofacial Region: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Removal of deeply embedded foreign bodies (FBs) in the craniomaxillofacial (CMF) region remains a significant surgical challenge because of the complex anatomy, proximity of critical neurovascular structures, and the limited accuracy of conventional imaging modalities for precise intraoperative localization. Inaccurate localization may increase operative time and the risk of iatrogenic injury. In recent years, there has been a considerable increase in the use of three-dimensional image-guided navigation systems (3D-IGNS) in various maxillofacial procedures, especially the extraction of penetrating FBs in the CMF area. This report describes the clinical application of 3D-IGNS for the safe and accurate removal of penetrating FBs in the CMF region. We present a case report of three patients with retained FBs resulting from gunshot injuries who underwent surgical extraction using 3D-IGNS. Preoperative computed tomography imaging was used for navigation planning, allowing accurate real-time intraoperative localization of the FBs. The navigation system facilitated precise surgical access and guided dissection while minimizing unnecessary tissue manipulation. In all cases, the FBs were accurately localized and successfully removed without significant intraoperative or postoperative complications. The procedures were completed without neurovascular injury or significant postoperative complications, and recovery was uncomplicated. The use of 3D-IGNS enabled precise and minimally invasive surgical approaches, reducing the risk of injury to adjacent vital structures. These cases suggest that 3D-IGNS is a safe and effective tool for managing complex CMF FBs, particularly in maxillofacial trauma cases where accurate localization is crucial to avoid injury to surrounding vital structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.