ArticleCureus2026
Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation Using Multi-Unit Abutments in a Completely Edentulous Patient: A Clinical Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implant-supported prostheses are a predictable treatment option for the rehabilitation of completely edentulous patients. When appropriate surgical and prosthodontic protocols are followed, they effectively restore function, esthetics, and occlusal stability. This case report describes the management of a 50-year-old male patient with complete maxillary and mandibular edentulism using implant-supported full-arch prostheses with multi-unit abutments (MUAs). Clinical and radiographic evaluation, including orthopantomogram and cone beam computed tomography, was performed for treatment planning. A total of 12 endosseous implants were placed, six in each arch, achieving a primary stability of 35 Ncm. Prosthetic rehabilitation was carried out using an open-tray impression technique, accurate jaw relation records, and passive framework verification. A screw-retained definitive prosthesis was subsequently delivered. All implants demonstrated successful osseointegration with satisfactory stability. The final prostheses exhibited good esthetics, functional occlusion, and improved patient comfort. The patient reported enhanced mastication and overall satisfaction. This case highlights that full-arch implant rehabilitation using screw-retained prostheses with MUAs is a reliable and predictable treatment approach for completely edentulous patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.