ArticleCureus2026
A Rare Case of Non-puerperal Uterine Inversion Caused by a Prolapsed Fibroid Polyp.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-puerperal uterine inversion is an extremely rare gynecological condition associated with significant diagnostic challenges. A high index of suspicion is essential when evaluating patients with atypical gynecological presentations to ensure timely diagnosis. Although multiple etiologies have been reported, it is most commonly associated with a prolapsed endometrial polyp, submucosal fibroid, or, less frequently, a malignant mass. Imaging modalities, including transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT), play a crucial role in confirming the diagnosis and identifying the underlying cause. Consideration of the patient's fertility is important, as uterine preservation may not be feasible in all cases. We, here, report the case of a 40-year-old nulliparous woman with a known diagnosis of fibroid uterus for the past three years, who presented with acute severe lower abdominal pain, urinary retention, and sudden prolapse of a large fibroid polyp measuring approximately 20 × 14 cm. Uterine inversion was suspected based on clinical examination and confirmed by radiological findings. Vaginal myomectomy was performed, and the uterine inversion was reduced manually under direct visualization. The patient had a smooth post-operative recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.