Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181468›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Coping Mechanism Adopted by Medical Interns to Manage Stress: A Mixed Methods Study.

Ayesha T Aejaz, Mubeena Haleema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ayesha T AejazRespiratory Medicine, Sagar Hospitals, Bengaluru, IND.
Mubeena HaleemaCommunity Medicine, Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences, Karimnagar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Understanding the coping strategies adopted by medical interns is essential for promoting well-being and improving the quality of medical education. A mixed methods study was conducted to assess and explore this in a medical college in Bangalore, India. Methods An explanatory mixed methods study design was employed with a quantitative phase followed by a qualitative phase. The Brief-COPE (Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory) questionnaire was used to assess the coping strategies among 106 medical interns, and an in-depth interview was conducted among 10 of them. Descriptive statistics were reported as mean (SD) for continuous variables and frequency (proportions) for categorical variables. An independent sample t-test was performed to compare the means between groups. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Transcripts were prepared within 48 hours and analyzed by thematic analysis through manual coding. Results Emotion‑focused coping score was 27.92 (6.30), problem‑focused coping score was 20.29 (4.67), and avoidant coping score was 14.99 (3.98). Acceptance (mean = 5.53, SD = 1.50) was the most commonly used coping strategy, followed by positive reframing, planning, self‑distraction, and active coping, while behavioral disengagement (mean = 3.88, SD = 1.71), denial (mean = 3.42, SD = 1.51), and substance use (mean = 2.48, SD = 1.18) were the least utilized. Qualitative themes evolved based on quantitative findings, i.e., problem-focused coping, emotion-focused coping, and avoidant coping. Emotion-focused coping was the most commonly used coping strategy. Subthemes were talking to family and friends, relaxation through distraction, acceptance and normalization of workload over time, managing through planning and completing, engaging in physical activity, and faith-based practices. Conclusion Problem-focused coping (quantitative findings) and emotion‑focused coping (qualitative findings) emerged as the most commonly adopted coping strategies among medical interns. Acceptance, a subtype of emotion‑focused coping, was the most frequently used strategy. Age and gender differences were observed, with older interns favoring acceptance and male interns more often employing active coping. These findings highlight the strong need for awareness programs and structured interventions that promote the mental well‑being of medical interns.

Indexed as

brief cope scalecoping mechanismmedical internsmedical internshipmental wellbeingmixed methods researchqualitative and quantitative researchstress copingtransition to internshipworkplace stress

Identifiers

PMID42181468
PMCPMC13191394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.