ArticleCureus2026
Post-burn Inguinoperineal Contracture With Intercrural Adhesion: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post‑burn inguinoperineal contractures are rare but can lead to severe functional impairment, anatomical distortion, and significant psychosocial burden when not treated promptly. We report the case of a 25‑year‑old woman with a nine‑year‑old inguinoperineal burn initially managed with traditional methods and without specialized medical care. She presented with a severe contracture and extensive intercrural adhesion that markedly limited thigh abduction and distorted the external genital anatomy, while the remainder of her physical examination was unremarkable. Surgical management consisted of complete excision of the fibrotic tissue, full release of the contracture, sharp division of the intercrural adhesion, and anatomical reconstruction of the inguinal folds, followed by tension‑free direct closure. Standard perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was administered due to the inguinoperineal location and extent of the procedure, with no infectious complications observed. The postoperative course was uneventful, with appropriate healing at the seven‑day evaluation and progressive suture removal on postoperative days 12 and 14. Subsequent follow‑up at six weeks and three months demonstrated normal scar evolution, absence of dehiscence, retraction, or recurrent contracture, and stable preservation of the functional range of motion achieved after surgery. This case highlights that even long‑standing post‑burn contractures can be effectively corrected through complete surgical release and tailored anatomical reconstruction, and that direct closure may represent a safe and feasible option in settings where advanced reconstructive techniques are not available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.