ArticleCureus2026
Added Effects of Loaded Sit-to-Stand Exercise on Sit-to-Stand Ability and Gait Speed in Stroke: An Experimental Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStroke frequently results in motor impairments that affect one side of the body, leading to difficulty in performing everyday functional tasks. Among these, sit-to-stand (STS) movement and walking are commonly affected due to reduced lower limb strength, impaired balance, and asymmetrical weight-bearing. The STS movement is a fundamental transitional task required for independence, as it bridges static sitting to dynamic mobility. Since STS performance shares biomechanical and muscular demands with walking, targeted strengthening during this task may influence gait performance. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the added effects of loaded STS exercise on STS ability and gait speed in individuals with stroke. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis experimental study was conducted on 34 stroke participants recruited from the physiotherapy outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital. Participants were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group A (n = 17) received loaded STS exercise along with conventional therapy, while Group B (n = 17) received only conventional therapy. Pre-intervention assessment was performed using the STS test via NeuroCom Balance Master (NeuroCom International, Inc., Clackamas, OR) to assess STS ability parameters, including weight transfer time, rising index, weight-bearing symmetry, and center of gravity sway velocity. Gait speed was assessed using the 10-meter walk test. Both groups received treatment for 60 minutes per session, three times per week for two weeks. Post-intervention assessments were performed at the end of the second week using the same outcome measures.
resultsIntragroup analysis showed a statistically significant difference between pre- and post-intervention values for STS ability parameters, including weight transfer time, rising index, weight-bearing symmetry, and center of gravity sway velocity, in both groups (p < 0.05). Gait speed assessed using the 10-meter walk test also showed statistically significant improvement within both groups. However, intergroup analysis revealed statistically significant differences between Groups A and B for STS ability parameters and gait speed, indicating greater improvement in the experimental group receiving loaded STS exercise.
conclusionLoaded STS exercise, along with conventional therapy, significantly improved STS ability and gait speed in stroke patients. Compared to conventional therapy alone, loaded STS exercise demonstrated greater improvement in STS parameters and walking speed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.