ArticleCureus2026
Early-Onset Severe Preeclampsia as an Independent Predictor of New-Onset Maternal Arrhythmia During Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Early-onset severe preeclampsia (EOSPE) is characterized by marked vascular injury, systemic inflammation, and acute hemodynamic stress. However, its independent association with newly occurring maternal arrhythmias during pregnancy has not been well established. Objective To evaluate whether EOSPE independently increases the risk of new-onset maternal arrhythmia using propensity score matching. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database from 2015 to 2024. Pregnant individuals aged 18 to 45 years were included. EOSPE was defined as preeclampsia with severe features occurring before 34 weeks of gestation according to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria. The primary outcome was new-onset maternal arrhythmia, including supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation or flutter, ventricular arrhythmias, clinically significant ectopy, or conduction disorders occurring during pregnancy or within six weeks postpartum. Patients with prior arrhythmia or structural heart disease were excluded. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 742 EOSPE patients were matched 1:1 with controls without hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Matching variables included age, race, body mass index, chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, obesity, tobacco use, and prior adverse pregnancy history. Statistical analyses included conditional logistic regression, multivariable adjustment, Cox proportional hazards modeling, and subgroup interaction testing. Results Following matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced with standardized mean differences below 0.08. New-onset maternal arrhythmia occurred in 6.2% (46/742) of EOSPE patients compared with 2.4% (18/742) of controls, corresponding to an absolute risk difference of 3.8%. EOSPE was associated with increased odds of arrhythmia (odds ratio 2.68, 95% confidence interval 1.53 to 4.70; p < 0.001), which remained significant after adjustment (adjusted odds ratio 2.49, 95% confidence interval 1.39 to 4.45; p = 0.002). Time-to-event analysis demonstrated a higher hazard of arrhythmia (hazard ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.38 to 4.20; log-rank p < 0.001). Subtype analysis showed increased rates of supraventricular tachycardia (3.5% vs. 1.3%) and atrial fibrillation or flutter (1.5% vs. 0.4%) in the EOSPE group. Conclusions EOSPE is independently associated with a significantly increased risk of new-onset maternal arrhythmia during pregnancy and the postpartum period. These findings support closer cardiovascular monitoring in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.