ArticleCureus2026
Turkish Dentists' Knowledge of Implant Options for Atrophic Jaws: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAtrophic edentulous jaws present significant challenges for implant rehabilitation. Although advanced techniques such as zygomatic, transnasal and All-on-4® (Nobel Biocare, Kloten, Switzerland) implants are increasingly used, the level of clinicians' knowledge and clinical competence among dentists remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the knowledge levels of Turkish dentists regarding advanced implant techniques in atrophic jaws and their self-reported clinical competencies. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 277 Turkish dentists using a structured 19-item questionnaire assessing demographics, knowledge, self-reported clinical competence, and educational expectations. Knowledge scores were categorized as low, moderate, or high. Associations between variables were analyzed using the chi-square test. The internal consistency of the Likert scale items was assessed using the Cronbach alpha coefficient.
resultsAmong participants, 52.7% demonstrated moderate knowledge, while 27.8% showed high knowledge levels. Significant knowledge gaps were identified particularly for subperiosteal and zygomatic implants. Higher knowledge levels were significantly associated with greater preference for minimally invasive procedures, digital planning, and personalized treatment approaches (p < 0.05). The internal consistency of the proficiency scale was excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.912).
conclusionsTurkish dentists demonstrate moderate knowledge but limited clinical confidence regarding advanced implant techniques. These findings highlight the need for improved integration of advanced implantology into undergraduate education and structured continuing professional development programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.