ReviewCureus2026
Empowering Change: A Systematic Review of the Challenges Faced by Female Healthcare Workers in Pakistan.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pakistan's female healthcare force faces numerous challenges compared to their male counterparts that hinder their professional development. These systemic barriers contribute to mental health struggles and high attrition rates among women in the healthcare sector. This systematic review aims to identify and analyse the major difficulties encountered by female healthcare workers in Pakistan, focusing on socio-cultural and institutional factors, and to propose strategies for empowerment. The review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed/Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, Europe PubMed Central (Europe PMC), ScienceDirect, Elton B. Stephens Company (EBSCO) Open Dissertations, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from November 22 to December 5, 2024. Ultimately, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, focusing on workplace and socio-cultural challenges faced by female healthcare workers. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for qualitative studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. The findings highlight significant barriers such as workplace discrimination and social and cultural expectations that impede the professional growth of female healthcare workers. Women from lower socio-economic backgrounds face compounded obstacles, further entrenching gender disparities. The review also identifies a notable gap in female representation in leadership roles, underscoring the need for targeted interventions, including mentorship programs. Of 1,161 records identified, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising nine qualitative studies (64.3%) and five cross-sectional studies (35.7%). Professional barriers (workplace discrimination, harassment, lack of mentorship) were reported in 13 studies (92.9%), cultural impediments in five studies (35.7%), familial constraints in seven studies (50%), work-life balance issues in five studies (35.7%), and safety concerns in seven studies (50%). Women from lower socio-economic backgrounds faced compounded obstacles. A notable gap in female representation in leadership roles was identified across multiple studies. Addressing the multifaceted challenges endured by female healthcare workers in Pakistan requires a comprehensive approach that includes policy changes and organisational support. Implementing targeted interventions can foster an inclusive environment that empowers female healthcare professionals, ultimately enhancing the quality of care in Pakistan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.