ArticleCureus2026
Challenging Ureteroscopy in Complex Anatomy: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ureteroscopy is a well-established minimally invasive modality for the management of ureteric calculi; however, technical difficulty may arise in the presence of impacted stones and distorted urinary tract anatomy. We present a case of challenging ureteroscopic lithotripsy in a 24-year-old man with a symptomatic impacted distal ureteric calculus measuring approximately 9 × 8 × 10 mm, associated with hydroureteronephrosis and markedly altered pelvic orientation due to kyphoscoliosis. The patient also had underlying metabolic bone disease with renal osteodystrophy, which further complicated perioperative positioning and anesthetic management. Preoperative imaging demonstrated distorted pelvic anatomy, an abnormal ureteral course, and a high-density distal ureteric stone. During surgery, spinal deformity and pelvic tilt created a highly angulated ureteral path, reducing ureteroscopic maneuverability and increasing resistance to advancement. The stone was fragmented using a combined pneumatic and laser lithotripsy approach, and a double-J ureteral stent was placed to facilitate drainage and ureteral healing. The postoperative course was uneventful, with complete stone clearance and preservation of renal function. This case highlights the importance of recognizing anatomical distortion, skeletal comorbidity, and stone-related factors as causes of difficult ureteroscopy and underscores the value of careful preoperative imaging, individualized planning, and intraoperative adaptability in complex endourological cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.