ReviewCureus2026
Therapeutic Efficacy of Nanodrug Delivery Compared With Current Nonsurgical Treatments for Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melanoma is an aggressive skin cancer characterized by high metastatic potential and drug resistance with limited responses to available therapies. Therefore, further research regarding treatments and technologies, such as nanoparticles for cutaneous melanoma, is essential. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize published evidence on the safety and efficacy of using nanoparticles with cutaneous melanoma treatments to reduce tumor recurrence and/or survival outcomes for melanoma patients. A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar was conducted from January 2008 to January 2023. Publications describing randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials of nanoparticle cutaneous melanoma treatment were included. The risk of bias for the included studies was rated according to the Cochrane Handbook, and the strength of the clinical data and subsequent melanoma treatment recommendations were graded according to the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Seven studies were included, which involved 825 adult patients. Most of these patients had stage III/IV cutaneous melanoma. The outcomes measured across the studies were immune response, progression-free survival, tumor response rate, and toxicity. Both the MelQbg10 vaccine and nab-paclitaxel induced positive responses in patients. Novel nanoparticle-based cutaneous melanoma treatments have been shown to have increased therapeutic efficacy, improved survival, and reduced tumor recurrence compared with current nonsurgical therapies in selected studies. However, this is limited by the small number of studies, heterogeneous interventions, and limited robust comparative data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.