Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181325›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Ultrasound-Guided Endometrial Polypectomy Performed in an Office Setting Without Hysteroscopy.

Vijaya B Bayyarapu, Sirisha R Gundabattula, Pranuthi Rangaram, Sarah Ashrafi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vijaya B BayyarapuDepartment of Gynecology, Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, IND.
Sirisha R GundabattulaDepartment of Gynecology, Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, IND.
Pranuthi RangaramDepartment of Gynecology, Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, IND.
Sarah AshrafiDepartment of Gynecology, Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial polyps are localized overgrowths of the endometrium that protrude into the endometrial cavity. Symptomatic persistent endometrial polyps warrant removal. Hysteroscopic polypectomy is the gold standard for endometrial polyp removal, with office-based procedures gaining popularity in recent years. We report an alternative technique of endometrial polypectomy in the office under transabdominal ultrasound guidance using an atraumatic 5-mm laparoscopic grasper, which is particularly useful when a hysteroscope is unavailable. This procedure could be successfully completed in more than 95% of women within a median duration of 15 minutes, with a median pain score of 3 on a scale of 10. The advantages of a laparoscopic grasper over the oft-used ovum forceps or sponge-holding forceps are also highlighted. Ultrasound-guided outpatient polypectomy appears to be a safe, well-tolerated, and cost-effective alternative to hysteroscopy for endometrial polypectomy and warrants further research.

Indexed as

ambulatory gynecologyendometrial polyplaparoscopic grasperoffice gynecologyultrasonographyuterine polypectomy

Identifiers

PMID42181325
PMCPMC13190713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.