Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181313›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Spontaneous Erosion of a 15-Year-Old Retained Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reservoir Into the Bladder: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Alaa Hamada, Lillian Lai, David Staskin, Shaheen Alanee

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alaa HamadaUrology, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, USA.
Lillian LaiUrology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA.
David StaskinUrology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, USA.
Shaheen AlaneeUrology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the absence of infection, the reservoir of a malfunctioning three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is often left in place during replacement. Experts believe that the risks associated with reservoir explantation outweigh the risks of a drain-and-retain approach. However, there is no clear consensus on monitoring. The objective of this case report is to highlight the need for vigilance regarding long-term potential complications associated with retained reservoirs, as this report describes a retained reservoir eroding spontaneously into the bladder 15 years post-placement in a 69-year-old man. The patient had been reporting gross hematuria, recurrent UTIs, and worsened lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). CT imaging, followed by cystoscopy, demonstrated the decommissioned reservoir in the bladder. The patient then underwent exploratory laparotomy and bladder exploration to remove the eroding reservoir and replace the functional three-piece IPP with a malleable one. By reviewing the available literature, we found three clinical scenarios using variable clinical approaches to deal with bladder erosion by the reservoir, whether functional or decommissioned. In conclusion, patients with retained IPP reservoirs are at potential risk for complications. Prosthesis erosion may appear in the differential diagnosis when patients with a history of IPP placement present with hematuria or LUTS. Long-term investigation is needed to identify patients at high risk of complications and to elucidate proper monitoring and best surgical practices to manage these complications.

Indexed as

bladder erosionpenile implant complicationpenile implantsreservoirsalvage procedure

Identifiers

PMID42181313
PMCPMC13189719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.