Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181251›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Naturalistic climbing reveals adaptive strategies for interlimb coordination in freely moving mice.

Christopher J Black, Marco Beato, Liam E Browne, Robert M Brownstone, Stephanie C Koch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher J BlackUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Marco BeatoDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology, and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.
Liam E BrowneWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, UK.
Robert M BrownstoneUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Stephanie C KochDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology, and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-limb coordination is vital for mammalian locomotion. While coordination requires reliable organization of limb movements, it also requires flexibility to adapt to environmental demands. In natural settings, animals must navigate diverse terrains that impose unique challenges. Climbing, for example, introduces constraints due to gravitational load, substrate variability, and the need for behaviors like reaching and grasping. Understanding how animals accommodate these demands provides insight into the flexibility of motor systems supporting locomotion. To address this, we developed a naturalistic climbing assay to investigate multi-limb coordination in freely moving mice. Climbing gait emulated aspects of horizontal locomotion, including a speed-dependent decrease in duty factor. However, coordination between homologous limb pairs was asymmetric, with forelimbs favoring anti-phase movements and hindlimbs showing a tendency toward in-phase movements. Notably, mice adjusted this strategy to overcome vertical gaps. Our results reveal that mice engage unique coordination strategies during climbing and adapt them to navigate vertical challenges.

Indexed as

Behavioral neuroscienceBiological sciencesBiomechanicsKinematicsNatural sciencesRodent behavior

Identifiers

PMID42181251
PMCPMC13194540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.