ReviewiScience2026
Mechanistic actions of eldecalcitol and alfacalcidol across the muscle-metabolic axis: A selectivity perspective in sarcopenia and type 2 diabetes.
Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sarcopenia and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) share a convergent molecular landscape characterized by chronic low-grade inflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and impaired insulin-anabolic signaling in skeletal muscle. Although vitamin D receptor (VDR) activation has been implicated in modulating each of these domains, vitamin D analogs are frequently regarded as pharmacologically interchangeable. However, it remains unclear whether structurally distinct VDR ligands may exhibit functional selectivity, generating qualitatively divergent transcriptional and signaling outcomes within the muscle-metabolic axis. In this review, we examine eldecalcitol and alfacalcidol, two clinically approved active vitamin D analogs, as pharmacological models to interrogate ligand-specific VDR signaling. We analyze differences in structural configuration, binding protein affinity, metabolic activation, and receptor engagement dynamics, and evaluate their intersection with three key domains relevant to sarcopenia and T2DM: NF-κB-mediated inflammation, Nrf2-dependent redox regulation, and PI3K/Akt/mTOR-FOXO signaling governing muscle protein turnover. We stratify available evidence into direct skeletal muscle data, systemic and non-muscle findings, and hypothesis-driven integrative models. While preclinical studies suggest context-dependent modulation of inflammatory and anabolic pathways, direct comparative analyses demonstrating ligand-specific VDR transcriptional bias in human skeletal muscle remain lacking. Accordingly, the concept of functional selectivity is presented as a biologically plausible but as yet unproven framework, intended to guide future translational investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.