ArticleiScience2026
Motor equivalence in motor awareness.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor awareness (MA) describes the conscious access we have to the details of our movements. Although sensorimotor control relies on effector-specific transformations, many studies report similar MA thresholds across effectors, suggesting a shared, abstract representation. We tested this by having participants perform the same goal-directed reaching task once with a hand-held joystick and once by leaning with the whole body (center-of-mass displacement), using veridical or randomly deviated visual feedback. We measured corrective motor responses and fitted psychometric functions to derive MA thresholds. MA did not differ between effectors in non-deviated control trials or in "converging" trials where compensation aided the reach and thresholds correlated strongly between effectors. By contrast, in "diverging" trials with increased kinematic demand, MA relied more on effector-specific sensorimotor information. These findings support a largely effector-independent MA mechanism, consistent with motor-equivalence principles, that is flexibly reweighted toward effector-specific transformations under uncertainty, thereby linking low-level sensorimotor corrections with abstract motor representations and consolidating a gap in conceptual frameworks of the sense of agency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.