ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Analysis of infection characteristics and clinical predictive indicators of different bacterial diabetic foot in Yunnan area.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the infection characteristics of different bacterial diabetic foot (DF) in Yunnan area, and to provide reference basis and clinical predictive indicators for individualized treatment of patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) in this region. Methods: A total of 194 local permanent DF patients admitted to the Department of Endocrinology of our hospital from January 2023 to May 2024 were selected. The incidence and drug resistance of DFI were analyzed. Based on bacterial Gram staining as the reference standard, patients were divided into the single-strain Gram-positive bacterial infection group (G Results: Among 194 patients, 116 underwent culture of foot ulcer tissue secretions, of which 71 had positive pathogen culture results and 45 had negative results, with a bacterial detection rate of 61.20%. The most common pathogen of bacterial diabetic foot in Yunnan area was Staphylococcus aureus, followed by Escherichia coli. Staphylococcus aureus showed high resistance to penicillin, clindamycin, and erythromycin; Escherichia coli showed high resistance to ampicillin, cefazolin, doxycycline, and compound sulfamethoxazole. The course of diabetic foot in the G
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.