ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2026
Six-month evaluation of normal mouse brain side effects: Comparing FLASH and conventional proton partial brain irradiation.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Preclinical studies demonstrated ultra-high dose-rate radiation treatment ability to effectively control local tumour growth while reducing damage to healthy tissues. This methodological pilot study was designed and conducted to establish an irradiation setup and to generate data for future studies investigating long-term side effects of mouse brain irradiation with proton FLASH (FLASH-PT) and conventional proton therapy (CONV-PT). Material and methods: Fourteen C57BL/6JRj female mice were partial brain irradiated with a single dose of 22.5 Gy using a proton spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). Mice were randomised into FLASH-PT (268 Gy/s, n = 6), CONV-PT (0.27 Gy/s, n = 6), and unirradiated sham groups (n = 2). In addition to skin reaction monitoring as short-term endpoint, regular contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed during the six-month follow-up. Brains were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded and stained to assess activation of microglia. Results: The analysis of skin reactions demonstrates a trend in tissue-sparing effect for the FLASH group. In the brain MRI, no contrast enhancement was observed after irradiation. Although no group-level differences in microglia activation were observed between FLASH-PT and CONV-PT, both treatments showed increased density of activated microglia, which was distinct in specific regions within the periventricular area. Conclusion: The established irradiation setup allowed for a clinically relevant approach to preclinical FLASH-PT research. Partially irradiated brain showed no microglia-related FLASH effect. Further studies are required to fully comprehend dose-effect curves and timing for the FLASH effect in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.