Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181093›Full record

ReviewVeterinary and animal science2026

Do foot and mouth disease vaccines affect bovine bull fertility? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Muloongo C Sitali, Limbikani Matumba, Madalitso Chelenga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muloongo C SitaliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Limbikani MatumbaFoodPlus Research Group, Faculty of Life Sciences, Natural Resources, LUANAR, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Madalitso ChelengaDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, The Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Lilongwe. Malawi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious, reportable, and economically devastating disease of cattle and other cloven-hoofed animals. Vaccination against FMD remains the mainstay control strategy in many countries prone to the disease. Evidence shows that vaccinations against FMD could have negative consequences on bull fertility; however, the existence of that threat has received little attention amongst researchers and governments, probably due to weaker evidence from individual reports. This review aimed to systematically gather available evidence from different studies and meta-analyse the data to provide evidence-based pooled estimates of the effects of FMD vaccines on key indicators of bull fertility. To that end, we gathered and analysed published data from PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to determine the pooled estimates or descriptive synthesis of the effects of FMD vaccine on semen quality, measured before and after administration. A total of 9 articles were included in the meta-analysis, from which semen parameters were pooled using the inverse variance method, while 4 additional studies were synthesized descriptively. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was used to measure the effect sizes, with statistical significance set at

Indexed as

BovinesFMDSemen qualitySperm parametersVaccination

Identifiers

PMID42181093
PMCPMC13191262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.