ReviewVeterinary and animal science2026
Do foot and mouth disease vaccines affect bovine bull fertility? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious, reportable, and economically devastating disease of cattle and other cloven-hoofed animals. Vaccination against FMD remains the mainstay control strategy in many countries prone to the disease. Evidence shows that vaccinations against FMD could have negative consequences on bull fertility; however, the existence of that threat has received little attention amongst researchers and governments, probably due to weaker evidence from individual reports. This review aimed to systematically gather available evidence from different studies and meta-analyse the data to provide evidence-based pooled estimates of the effects of FMD vaccines on key indicators of bull fertility. To that end, we gathered and analysed published data from PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to determine the pooled estimates or descriptive synthesis of the effects of FMD vaccine on semen quality, measured before and after administration. A total of 9 articles were included in the meta-analysis, from which semen parameters were pooled using the inverse variance method, while 4 additional studies were synthesized descriptively. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was used to measure the effect sizes, with statistical significance set at
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.