Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181074›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

Perceptions of undergraduate midwifery students regarding academic self-efficacy at the selected Nursing Education Institutions in Gauteng province.

Nkhensani Florence Mabunda, Dorica Motaung, Yvonne Rambuwani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nkhensani Florence MabundaSefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Molotlegi Street, Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria, Gauteng. P.O Box 60, Medunsa 0204, South Africa.
Dorica MotaungSefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Molotlegi Street, Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria, Gauteng. P.O Box 60, Medunsa 0204, South Africa.
Yvonne RambuwaniSefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Molotlegi Street, Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria, Gauteng. P.O Box 60, Medunsa 0204, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how undergraduate midwifery students view their academic self-efficacy is crucial for gaining a deeper insight into their learning experiences, levels of confidence, and preparedness to perform competently in clinical settings. Academic self-efficacy not only affects students' motivation and academic performance but also impacts how they manage academic pressures and the emotional demands of midwifery training. By identifying the factors that influence students' perceptions and by implementing targeted, evidence-based strategies to enhance both academic and psychological support, Nursing Education Institutions can improve students' learning outcomes and overall well-being. This qualitative research study aims to gain insights into undergraduate midwives' perceptions of their academic and psychological well-being at the selected Nursing Education Institutions in Gauteng province. The study is grounded in Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory, which offers a comprehensive lens for examining how personal beliefs, environmental conditions, and behavioural factors interact to shape students' learning experiences and coping strategies. The results will help students understand factors influencing their academic journey, develop strategies to overcome challenges and inform policy decisions related to midwifery education and training, and guide institutional policies aimed at strengthening midwifery education and student support systems.

Indexed as

Academic self-efficacyDescriptiveExplorativeMidwifery studentsPerceptionsQualitative

Identifiers

PMID42181074
PMCPMC13197691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.