ArticleAcademic pathology
Trends in the diversity of board-certified pathologists in the United States.
Article in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medicine has historically excluded several marginalized groups, including but not limited to women and people of color. A lack of diversity is an injustice to those excluded from the field and adversely affects the patients we serve. We obtained de-identified demographic data from the American Board of Pathology to examine the diversity of the 39,124 US pathologists certified from its founding through 2024. We focus on pathologists certified since 2006, when continuing certification was introduced and data are most complete. Female representation has steadily increased, with 53% of pathologists certified since 2006 identifying as female compared to 27% of pathologists certified earlier. Nonbinary individuals represent 0.04% of active pathologists. Among active pathologists certified in 2006 or later, 89% identify as White or Asian, and 92% identify as non-Hispanic/Latino/Spanish origin. We observed much lower female representation in clinical pathology only (39%) compared to anatomic only (52%) and anatomic and clinical (54%). Representation varies across subspecialties, with the lowest female representation in clinical informatics (25%). This work demonstrates a substantial improvement in female representation among recently certified pathologists, but the overall proportion of women with active certification remains under 50%, and women are underrepresented even among recently certified pathologists in some subspecialties. Several racial and ethnic groups (American Indian or Alaska Native, Black or African American, and Hispanic/Latino) remain severely underrepresented. This work highlights the continued need to recruit and retain a diverse workforce and ensure that all pathologists have equitable access to the full range of career trajectories in our field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.