Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42181028›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials and biosystems2026

Systematic biocompatibility assessment of 4-µm surface silicone implants.

Isaac Mora-Leiva, Christine M Mack, Christine Clausen-Oreamuno, Yessica Elizondo Hidalgo, Vanessa Zamora-Mora, Alonso Villalobos, Audry Zoncsich, Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz, Marcos Sforza, Roberto De Mezerville

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials and biosystems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Isaac Mora-LeivaEstablishment Labs, Coyol Free Zone, Alajuela, 20102, Costa Rica.
Christine M MackEstablishment Labs, Coyol Free Zone, Alajuela, 20102, Costa Rica.
Christine Clausen-OreamunoEstablishment Labs, Coyol Free Zone, Alajuela, 20102, Costa Rica.
Yessica Elizondo HidalgoEstablishment Labs, Coyol Free Zone, Alajuela, 20102, Costa Rica.
Vanessa Zamora-MoraEstablishment Labs, Coyol Free Zone, Alajuela, 20102, Costa Rica.
Alonso VillalobosEstablishment Labs, Coyol Free Zone, Alajuela, 20102, Costa Rica.
Audry ZoncsichEstablishment Labs, Coyol Free Zone, Alajuela, 20102, Costa Rica.
Alexandre Mendonça MunhozBreast Surgery Group, Plastic Surgery Division, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos SforzaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Dolan Park Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Roberto De MezervilleEstablishment Labs, Coyol Free Zone, Alajuela, 20102, Costa Rica.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biocompatibility refers to a medical device's ability to perform its intended function without provoking adverse biological responses. Although global regulatory agencies have introduced measures to improve risk communication about breast implants, there remains a lack of published preclinical data evaluating their biocompatibility. To enhance transparency and patient education regarding implant safety, this study aims to characterize the biocompatibility profile of a silicone breast implant with a 4-micron surface roughness shell by evaluating its performance across ISO 10,993 biological endpoints relevant to current safety concerns and to make this data publicly available. Launched in 2010, it is now available in over 90 countries, including a recent approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for breast augmentation. Genotoxicity testing revealed no mutagenic effects. A 26-week in vivo carcinogenicity study in Tg.rasH2 mice showed no evidence of carcinogenic potential. Immunophenotyping of peripheral blood and spleen indicated no signs of immunotoxicity. The device was also found to be non-cytotoxic, non-sensitizing, non-irritating, and non-toxic following acute, subacute, and chronic exposure. Furthermore, it demonstrated no pyrogenic or hemolytic activity and no evidence of reproductive or developmental toxicity. This is, to our knowledge, the first report of detailed results of ISO 10,993-1 biocompatibility tests for a silicone breast implant. Collectively, these findings provide robust scientific support for the biocompatibility of 4-micron average roughness shell surface silicone implants. Ongoing research and transparent reporting will continue to inform patients and clinicians, support clinical decision-making, and strengthen public confidence in the safety of these devices.

Indexed as

Animal modelsBiocompatibilityBreast implantsCarcinogenicityGenotoxicityImmunotoxicity

Identifiers

PMID42181028
PMCPMC13196457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.