ArticleBiomaterials and biosystems2026
Carp collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration: evaluation in a rat femoral defect model.
Article in Biomaterials and biosystems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) relies on barrier membranes to stabilize the blood clot and maintain a protected healing space. Collagen membranes are typically derived from mammalian sources; however, concerns regarding zoonotic transmission, ethics, and cost have driven interest in alternative materials. Fish-derived collagen has emerged as a potential substitute. A novel membrane from European carp ( Methods: Standardized cortical defects were created in the femora of 21 Wistar rats. Four treatments were evaluated: empty defect, carp collagen membrane alone, Bio-Oss® + carp collagen membrane, and Bio-Oss® + Bio-Gide®. Animals were euthanized at 4, 12, and 16 weeks. Healing was assessed by micro-CT and histology. Descriptive statistics (median, IQR) were used, and group comparisons were performed using non-paramertic Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn's post-hoc testing; effect sizes were reported as η². Results: Defects treated with the carp collagen membrane alone showed a consistent trend toward higher median healing scores, greater new bone formation, and smaller residual defect size, although differences were not statistically significant. When combined with Bio-Oss®, outcomes were less favorable than with Bio-Oss® + Bio-Gide®. Conclusions: The carp collagen membrane supported bone healing in a non-critical-size rat femoral defect model and demonstrated favorable biocompatibility. These findings suggest that fish-derived collagen may represent a promising alternative membrane material, particularly in indications where membrane function alone is sufficient. Further validation in large-animal critical-size defect models is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.