ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2026
The prediction of essential medicine demand using machine learning and traditional methods on EPSS Gondar hub 2018-2022 data.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: No prior research has utilized predictive models for forecasting essential medicine demand in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the most accurate predictive model for predicting essential medicine demand at public health facilities via traditional and machine learning techniques in Northwest Ethiopia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from September to December 2023 using five years of consumption data from the Ethiopian pharmaceutical supply service. The top ten essential medicines were identified based on defined daily dose utilization. Demand prediction was performed in Python using nine models, naïve, ARIMA, linear regression, support vector machine, random forest, artificial neural network, k-nearest neighbor, gradient boosting, and extreme gradient boosting. Model accuracy was evaluated using R squared, root mean squared error and mean absolute error. Results: Extreme gradient boosting was the best-performing model, achieving an R Conclusions: The extreme gradient boosting model provided comparable model fitness with lower error estimates between the training and test datasets. Therefore, incorporating machine learning models into healthcare supply chains can significantly improve forecasting accuracy and ensure a more reliable supply of essential medicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.