ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Investigating the Role of Fish Skin Grafts in Treating Complex Posterior Spinal Wounds.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complex wound management in spinal surgery poses significant challenges, especially in high-risk patients. Wound dehiscence, infection, and posterior hardware complicate healing. Intact fish skin grafts (IFSGs), derived from North Atlantic cod, have shown promise in reinforcing soft tissue due to their structural similarity to the human extracellular matrix, retention of polyunsaturated fatty acids, and antimicrobial properties. This study evaluates IFSG in reducing wound complications and facilitating healing in complex posterior spinal revisions and high-risk patients. Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients undergoing cervical, cervicothoracic, and lumbar revisions and high-risk patients undergoing cervical and lumbar closure, with IFSG placement by a single plastic surgeon between November 2021 and November 2023. Eligible patients were older than 18 years and followed up for at least 6 months postoperatively. All procedures involved meticulous debridement, muscle mobilization, IFSG application over the fascia, and standardized postoperative care, including wound vacuum-assisted closure and drain management. Results: Of 13 patients who received IFSG, 11 underwent revision surgery for spinal wound dehiscence, and 2 underwent primary cervical and lumbar closures. Four patients required posterior hardware coverage. The median age was 68 years (range 51-81 y), with 53% women. Wound sizes ranged from 5 to 1920 cm Conclusions: IFSG offers a safe, effective option for managing complex spinal wounds. Its structural and biological properties support tissue repair and seem to reduce complications, making it a viable alternative or supplement for traditional wound management techniques.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.