ArticleTranslational cancer research2026
Clinical features, central nervous system risk, and therapeutic outcomes in primary sinonasal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective cohort study of 94 patients.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary sinonasal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PSN-DLBCL) is a rare extranodal malignancy accounting for approximately 1-2% of all lymphomas. Its clinical course, optimal treatment strategy, and the patterns and risk of central nervous system (CNS) involvement and relapse remain incompletely characterized. We therefore conducted a retrospective cohort study of treatment-naïve patients with PSN-DLBCL to describe clinicopathologic features, treatment patterns, and prognosis, and to explore the incidence and presentation of CNS involvement and relapse; given the retrospective study design and limited events, analyses are exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than conclusive. Methods: We enrolled 94 treatment-naïve patients with histologically confirmed PSN-DLBCL treated between 2009 and 2024. Baseline evaluation included positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. Treatment involved rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP), dose adjusted rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (da-R-EPOCH), or polatuzumab vedotin, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone (Pola-R-CHP) regimens. CNS prophylaxis included intrathecal chemotherapy and/or high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank testing. Prognostic factors were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. Landmark analyses were used to evaluate the impact of interim and end-of-treatment responses on survival. Results: The median age was 68.5 years; 61.7% had limited-stage disease. Baseline CNS involvement was identified in 9 patients (9.6%). Estimated 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 67.0% and 73.1%. Survival did not differ significantly by treatment regimen or primary site. High International Prognostic Index (IPI) score was independently associated with inferior OS [hazard ratio (HR) =3.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.26-7.68] and PFS (HR =2.51; 95% CI: 1.06-5.96) on multivariate analysis, and radiotherapy demonstrated a trend toward improved PFS. CNS relapse occurred in only 2 patients (2.1%), and CNS prophylaxis with HD-MTX or intrathecal chemotherapy showed no significant association with improved survival in this cohort. Achievement of complete response (CR) at interim and end-of-treatment evaluations was associated with significantly improved PFS and OS on landmark analysis. Conclusions: PSN-DLBCL shows favorable long-term outcomes with immunochemotherapy. Despite relatively frequent baseline CNS involvement, CNS relapse was rare. Local invasion might represent the main pathway for CNS involvement. Substituting intrathecal therapy for systemic HD-MTX is not recommended. The benefit of CNS prophylaxis was not evident in our cohort. High IPI score and failure to achieve CR were the primary adverse prognostic factors. These findings provide substantive real-world evidence and highlight the need for prospective studies to refine management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.